Overlooked: Paparazzi Vs. Malibu Surfers — Jun 26th 2008
Last weekend in Malibu, a group of paparazzi descended on the beach to take photos of actor Matthew McConaughy, who was surfing nearby. Their presence on the beach wouldn't have been notable--"paps," as these photographers and videographers are called, can be spotted most days in Malibu. But on this particular day, the group was confronted by a group of local surfers. Verbal sparring ensued as the surfers insisted on protecting both their beach and McConaughy. "Get off our beach," they told the paps. "Get a real job." Before long the incident escalated into violence. On video, the surfers can be see kicking one pap and throwing his camera into the water.
It's unclear who actually instigated the violence; the video would seem to implicate the local surfers, but the
Malibu Surfside reports that the paps were the aggressors, and that one of the photographers pulled a knife on the men. Regardless, the incident, which was quickly picked up by the media, highlighted the ongoing problem of paparazzi in Malibu. And many Angelenos quickly took the side of the locals. "The general sentiment around here is that any time a paparazzo gets his camera smashed or gets popped in the face or gets dunked in the water, we're all for it," Brian Pietro, owner of Malibu General Store, told the
Los Angeles Times. Gossip scribe Joanne Molloy, who writes the Rush & Molloy column for the
Daily News, says there's been an escalation in incidents involving citizens harassing the paps. "It used to be that celebrities like Chris Martin or Sean Penn or Alec Baldwin had to fight off the paparazzi themselves," Molloy writes in an email to Propeller. "But we've seen an increase in incidents like the one, with surfers in Malibu or clubgoers in New York who take the side of a star who's just trying to chillax."
As Molloy points out in yesterday's
Daily News, the beach fight quickly spread online following last weekend's incident. Thousands of comments were left on the website of the X17 agency, which sells photos to magazines, and paps were quick to respond to the disparaging comments. "I'm a pap," writes one commenter. "I've made $94K a year and I'm only four months into it... because stupid white trash people like your fat mother buy the magazines. We hunt the very people you worship for no reason."
Also lost in the debate---and the media coverage--was an another response. Why attack the photographers when the real villains are the magazines editors and publishers who pay for the photos? A moot point, says Rebecca Fox, managing editor of media web site Mediabistro.com. "It's parallel to the meat industry," she tells Propeller. "People elect not to think about how they get their information." She adds: "I think people want their celebrity stuff however they can get it."
At least one photographer has filed charges, according to reports, while Malibu Mayor Pamela Conley Ulich and L.A. County Sheriff Lee Baca announced that following last weekend's incident, a task force will consider whether paparazzi should be required to have special licenses. The task force will also "address what Ulich termed 'a new breed of paparazzi'," who "travel in packs, run red lights, make unsafe . . . U-turns in pursuit of their subject,' according to the
Los Angeles Times.
Police also will be heading to the same Malibu beach this weekend. According to comments left on the X17 website, the two sides are planning to have a huge rumble on the beach either on Saturday or Sunday. "The common theme seems to be that one of the weekend days, the two sides are going to come together," one police captain told the
Times.
Meanwhile, for all the fuss on the web, the submitted story got few votes here at Propeller. But it was a story that was noticed by locals--and by Propeller Scout Deirdre Woolard, who lives in Los Angeles. "I think that surfers always feel some ownership of the beaches that they frequent and so there is some ego there," she wrote in an email. "Also, it is at the core a sport which requires concentration and the proper environment. If the paparazzi were swarming a golf course (which they have started doing too), you'd hear about angry golfers whacking at cameras with five irons."
Deirdre also believes that paparazzi are indeed getting more aggressive, and using new tactics--like just staking out a spot and waiting for celebrities. "The groups have gotten bigger and bigger and can represent a danger to the community. I think keeping paparazzi off the beach is a good idea."
Tags:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
alexia — 8:34AM on Jun 27th 2008
1. This is actually interesting. At first I thought "why am I reading about surfers in Malibu?," and, truly, if both "sides" are a) stupid enough to have sides, and b) REALLY stupid enough to organize a fight, we know that all parties have waaaaaaay too much time on their hands. The real question that this article brings up is: why do people pay for magazines with pictures of celebrities?
D. — 11:55PM on Jun 27th 2008
2. I don't want to know what anyone is doing star or otherwise badly enough to see someone hurt or harassed over it. I think the photography field has changed to the point where it has lost the respect of most normal rational people. While an actor or actress or anyone else is off screen what ever they do is their own business not a public affair. If Mr. McConaughy thought what he was doing should be public knowledge he would have talked about it on one of the many talk shows he has been on. If Mr. McConaughy were not famous the "paps" would have been arrested for what they were doing and I don't feel that because he is an actor this changes the fact that it is indeed harassment and the "paps" should be charged and arrested. I would like to see it made illegal to print photos obtained this way. Who do the "paps" or the public think they are that the have a right to intimate knowledge of someone else's life? All of this for money?